Clearfield Borough Council Discusses Proposed Animal Nuisance Ordinance

CLEARFIELD – Clearfield Borough is continuing its work to solidify a new ordinance.

At Thursday’s work session, the Clearfield Borough Council discussed the proposed animal nuisance ordinance.

Council member Jim Kling said after reviewing the ordinance, he had some issues that he felt needed addressed before the ordinance came before council for final approval.

Kling brought up several concerns about the wording of certain sentences in different parts of the ordinance; however, his main concern was regarding the specifics dealing with chickens.

Kling said while problems with chickens has prompted the borough to begin working on the ordinance, there are already problems with other types of birds, such as turkeys, guinea fowl and ducks.

He said the ordinance lists regulations about what types of enclosures the chickens must be kept in and how many chickens can be housed on the property, but there’s no similar regulations for other types of birds.

Kling also had concerns about the number of animals that can be kept. He said the ordinance specifies no more than six animals per resident.

However, he pointed out that the way the ordinance is worded, one resident could have six animals and their spouse could also have six animals, which would mean 12 animals on one property.

He said he feels these problems should be addressed before the borough considers passing the ordinance.

According to previously published GANT News articles, the proposed ordinance outlines regulations for the keeping of animals, fowl, wild and exotic animals, venomous and constricting animals, and provides mechanisms for enforcement of any violations.

The proposed ordinance is also designed to reduce or eliminate public nuisances and conditions detrimental to public health, safety and welfare; limiting the number of animals on premises in the borough; and to prohibit the keeping of animals that pose a threat to public health, safety and welfare.

The proposed ordinance specifies that all animals must be securely tied or penned in a yard or enclosure in such a manner that the animal cannot break loose or run at large through the borough.

Owners must also keep their animals on a leash no greater than six feet in length and the animal must be prevented from entering upon the property of other residents without their consent.

The proposed ordinance prohibits keeping animals such as guinea fowl, sheep, cows, goats, or other barnyard animals within the borough limits.

However, residents wishing to raise or keep chickens within the borough can do so if they obtain a permit. Residents can only own six hens and roosters are prohibited.

The chickens must be kept in a secure enclosure/fenced in area at all times and secured in a henhouse during the evening hours.

The henhouse may be attached to a “chicken run” and the enclosure must be kept clean, dry and odor free at all times. The henhouse and chicken runs must provide adequate ventilation, as well as sun and shade areas, and must be impermeable to rodents, wild birds and predators (including dogs and cats)

The henhouse must provide the chickens with a minimum of four square feet per bird, have a roof, doors and must be enclosed on all four sides.

The henhouses and chicken runs must be located in the rear of a dwelling, at least 10 feet from the property line and 25 feet from any adjacent buildings.

The proposed ordinance also imposes limits on the number of animals a resident can own. Residents can keep no more than six animals.

The ordinance specifies that an aquarium would count as one pet and allows special circumstances where more than six animals can be owned.

Once the proposed ordinance is finalized and approved, any resident presently owning more than six animals can keep their animals, but they will not be allowed to replace them once they have died until they have only six animals remaining.

Finally, the proposed ordinance requires permits for anyone owning venomous and/or constricting snakes. The snakes must be kept in an approved aquarium with a hinged lid that contains a locking device.

Anyone owning a venomous snake is required to have up-to-date anti-venom and the owner will be held responsible for recapturing any snake that escapes their home.

Once the proposed ordinance is approved, any resident in violation will be subject to monetary fines and other legal action.

Police Arrest California Couple, Seize in Excess of 1 Kilo of Heroin
Graham Pleads Guilty to Leading Police on Chase

2 thoughts on “Clearfield Borough Council Discusses Proposed Animal Nuisance Ordinance

  1. Qualia

    I feel your pain jls, I’ve lived in the city, noise seems to be an accepted part of city life, that’s why I left it behind. I moved to one of the most remote regions of PA and still on the weekends and holidays they leave the city and bring their noise to the country. It’s amusing and sad that they come to the mountains for nature and spend so much time fighting it. Burning, slashing, mowing, recreating what they just left, why, just stay home. Illegal ATV use, trespassing. If I came to their neighborhoods and did what they do I’d be arrested.

  2. jls16845

    What they need to do is write noise Ordinance in this town…I have never lived in a town as noisy as Clearfield…..between the Fireworks being set off from may to sept…the fire trucks, non stop, cars with no mufflers, motorcycles with loud pipes, tractor trailers jake brakes, coreman’s train at all hrs of the night non stop, Ice plant not all the time but at times……. Soon to have garbage Trucks coming thru it all day long… Clearfield is 1 town you want to stay out of. They take care of the employers that come here but screw the people that live here! Now I know why I got this place so cheap. Can’t wait till the only thing I see of Clearfield is in my rear view mirror !

Leave a Reply