Even for the legendary Roger Federer, this was — nearly — unbelievable.
After missing the second half of last season with a knee injury, the Swiss star came back in style by winning the Australian Open Sunday and turning the tables on nemesis Rafael Nadal with a gripping 6-4, 3-6, 6-1, 3-6, 6-3 victory in just over 3 1/2 hours.
The clash marked an extraordinary comeback for the players, both of whom have battled recent injuries and are older than most of their fellow tournament opponents.
“I don’t think either one of us believed we were going to be in the finals at the Australian Open… four, five months ago, and here we stand in the finals,” Federer said.
But Federer was obviously much the happier.
“This is beautiful, but it’s still much better, the (other) trophy,” Nadal said as he looked at the runner-up trophy.
Federer wept when losing to Nadal in the 2009 Australian Open final in five sets. This time he cried tears of joy.
Never in his “wildest dreams” did the Swiss even expect to make the final, especially since he was handed a tough draw. So what must the 35-year-old — the second oldest man behind Ken Rosewall to win a major in the Open Era — have been thinking when bagging his record-extending 18th major and first since Wimbledon in 2012?
Federer had to do it the hard way, too, rallying from 3-1 down in the fifth. He rarely takes medical timeouts but did so entering the fifth set against Stan Wawrinka in the semifinals and at the same stage versus Nadal.
It appeared to be for the same issue, an upper leg complaint.
Yet he consistently threatened on the Nadal serve and finally broke through for 3-3 after Nadal’s forehand on game point clipped the tape and went wide.
In a game highlighted by a 26-shot rally that Federer won with a blistering forehand down the line, he broke again for 5-3 when a good backhand return forced an error. That after Nadal dug out of 0-40 to get to deuce.
But there was still drama to come.
In the last game, Federer fended off two break points with an ace and forehand winner. On a second match point his forehand cross-court was close to the line but ruled good. A challenge came from Nadal and the crowd roared when replays showed the ball to be good.
It was, truth be told, an anticlimactic conclusion as Federer had to wait before finally celebrating. The two hugged and exchanged words at the net.
Even if the hard courts and balls were quicker this year at the Australian Open — aiding Federer’s aggressive, flat-hitting game — all the numbers suggested Nadal held the edge in the 35th installment of what many consider to be the best men’s tennis rivalry of all time.
Nadal hadn’t lost to Federer at a grand slam since Wimbledon in 2007. He was 7-2 in grand slam finals against his friend and 23-11 overall.
Perhaps Nadal’s five-hour semifinal win over Grigor Dimitrov drained the 30-year-old.
Newly elected Hall of Famer Andy Roddick said last week the tussle might be the most important in men’s grand slam history. If Nadal had prevailed, he’d have been only two majors shy of Federer.
But now the gap has widened to four, maybe too much for Nadal to overcome even with his resurgence in Melbourne.
Nadal is always one to dwell on the positive and he’ll likely walk away from Melbourne in good spirits, despite Sunday’s reverse.
Whereas Federer dealt with the knee issue last year, most of Nadal’s year was blighted by a wrist problem.
Prior to the defeat to Federer, Nadal snapped a three-match losing streak in fifth sets and gained morale boosting victories over the likes of Dimitrov, Wimbledon finalist Milos Raonic and the German with immense potential, Alexander Zverev.
Federer’s win over Nadal, meanwhile, was his fourth top-10 scalp of the event.
Nadal took control of the match in the fourth, playing his best tennis.
His forehand, however, was highly inconsistent.
He was set to pounce early in the third but the first two games of the set proved important.
Federer led 40-0 on serve, only to face not one, not two, but three break points. On all three he slammed aces out wide. Aces would dig Federer out of trouble on at least half a dozen break points.
Key third set
Sagging, Nadal was broken in the ensuing game when Federer pounced on a return to force a forehand error. And unlike Federer — who hit 20 aces — Nadal wasn’t able to get much help from his serve. He countered with four aces.
The last time two players over 30 played in a men’s grand slam final was at the 2002 US Open, a swansong in another epic rivalry, between Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi.
Given the buzz generated by this final, let’s hope it won’t be the last duel between Federer and Nadal.
Tennis won Sunday. And so did Federer.